Abstract
This commentary considers the recent case-law on whether prisoners have a right to access artificial insemination facilities. The cases are considered in the context of rights under the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950 and the American Constitution. It is critical of the restrictive approach taken by the courts and advocates that the right to reproduce is, subject of course to some restrictions, a right that should not be too readily denied to prisoners.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 217-228 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Child and Family Law Quarterly |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2002 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- child law
- family law
- artificial insemination
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Queen on the Application of Mellor v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Prisoners and Artificial Insemination - Have the Courts got it right?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver