Abstract
This article engages the Weberian view on the scholarly vocation from a perspective informed by ‘strong reflexivity’. The reflexivist perspective is grounded in a sociological understanding of knowledge that calls for a coherent reformulation of the relation between the social nature and social function of science, and of the cognitive and axiological posture of scholarship understood as socio-political praxis. Drawing on the sociology of knowledge, the article argues that Weber’s perspective is untenable conceptually and practically. Strong reflexivity, here illustrated through Standpoint Feminism and Bourdieusian sociology, permits a coherent delineation of the problem of the scholarly vocation, in a way that reconciles the social origins, efficacy and responsibility of science, and hence allows for a more realist reformulation of the cognitive, social and moral dilemmas we face as scholars, educators, and citizens.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 995-1012 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Current Sociology |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| Early online date | 26 Feb 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01 Nov 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
Keywords
- Bourdieu
- Durkeim
- reflexivity
- sociology of knowledge
- Standpoint Feminism
- values
- Weber
- Durkheim
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The "Vocation" Redux: A Post-Weberian Perspective from the Sociology of Knowledge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver