To determine the optimal ultrasonographic screening method for rectal/rectosigmoid deep endometriosis: Ultrasound “sliding sign,” transvaginal ultrasound direct visualization or both?

Shannon Reid, Mercedes Espada, Chuan Lu, George Condous

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (SciVal)
155 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The study aim was to evaluate the transvaginal sonography (TVS) "sliding sign" alone, direct visualization of the bowel with TVS, and the combination of both methods (ie "sliding sign" and direct visualization of the bowel), to determine the optimal TVS method for the prediction of rectal/rectosigmoid deep endometriosis (DE).

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multicenter prospective observational study (January 2009-February 2017). All women underwent TVS to determine whether the "sliding sign" was positive/negative and whether rectal/rectosigmoid DE was present, followed by laparoscopic surgery. The association between a negative TVS "sliding sign" alone and the direct visualization of a rectal/rectosigmoid DE nodule alone during the TVS were correlated with the presence of rectal/rectosigmoid DE at laparoscopy. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios (LRs) were evaluated. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS: During the recruitment period, 410 consecutive women with suspected endometriosis were included. Complete TVS and laparoscopic surgical outcomes were available for 376 of the women (91.7%). Complete TVS and laparoscopic data were available for 376 women. Of the 376 women 76 (20.2%) had rectal/rectosigmoid DE at laparoscopy. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, positive and negative LRs for each method to predict bowel DE were: negative "sliding sign": 87%, 73.7%, 90.3%, 65.9%, 93.1%, 7.62, and 0.29, respectively; direct visualization: 91.0%, 86.8%, 92.3%, 74.2%, 96.5%, 11.3, and 0.14, respectively; combined approach: 90.2%, 69.7%, 95.3%, 79.1%, 92.6%, 14.94, and 0.32, respectively. A negative TVS "sliding sign" was significantly associated with the need for bowel surgery (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: The combination of the TVS "sliding sign" and direct visualization of the bowel during TVS appears to provide the most accurate assessment for the identification of rectal/rectosigmoid DE preoperatively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1287-1292
Number of pages6
JournalActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Volume97
Issue number11
Early online date14 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Nov 2018

Keywords

  • transvaginal sonography
  • "sliding sign"
  • deep endometriosis
  • rectal deep endometriosis
  • laparoscopy
  • “sliding sign”
  • Prospective Studies
  • Humans
  • Ultrasonography/methods
  • Rectal Diseases/diagnostic imaging
  • Endometriosis/diagnostic imaging
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Female
  • Sigmoid Diseases/diagnostic imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'To determine the optimal ultrasonographic screening method for rectal/rectosigmoid deep endometriosis: Ultrasound “sliding sign,” transvaginal ultrasound direct visualization or both?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this