TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards an improvement of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) age uncertainties
T2 - Modelling OSL ages with systematic errors, stratigraphic constraints and radiocarbon ages using the R package BayLum
AU - Guérin, Guillaume
AU - Lahaye, Christelle
AU - Heydari, Maryam
AU - Autzen, Martin
AU - Buylaert, Jan-Pieter
AU - Guibert, Pierre
AU - Jain, Mayank
AU - Kreutzer, Sebastian
AU - Lebrun, Brice
AU - Murray, Andrew S.
AU - Thomsen, Kristina J
AU - Urbanova, Petra
AU - Philippe, Anne
N1 - Funding Information:
This study received financial support from the Région Aquitaine (in particular through the CHROQUI programme) and from the LaScArBx project (project no. ANR-10- LABX-52). Martin Autzen and Jan-Pieter Buylaert received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme ERC-2014-StG 639904-RELOS. Guillaume Guérin received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant no. 851793) Project QuinaWorld (grant no. ERC-StG-2019).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Guillaume Guérin et al.
PY - 2021/4/28
Y1 - 2021/4/28
N2 - Statistical analysis has become increasingly important in optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating since it has become possible to measure signals at the single-grain scale. The accuracy of large chronological datasets can benefit from the inclusion, in chronological modelling, of stratigraphic constraints and shared systematic errors. Recently, a number of Bayesian models have been developed for OSL age calculation; the R package "BayLum"presented herein allows different models of this type to be implemented, particularly for samples in stratigraphic order which share systematic errors. We first show how to introduce stratigraphic constraints in BayLum; then, we focus on the construction, based on measurement uncertainties, of dose covariance matrices to account for systematic errors specific to OSL dating. The nature (systematic versus random) of errors affecting OSL ages is discussed, based - as an example - on the dose rate determination procedure at the IRAMAT-CRP2A laboratory (Bordeaux). The effects of the stratigraphic constraints and dose covariance matrices are illustrated on example datasets. In particular, the benefit of combining the modelling of systematic errors with independent ages, unaffected by these errors, is demonstrated. Finally, we discuss other common ways of estimating dose rates and how they may be taken into account in the covariance matrix by other potential users and laboratories. Test datasets are provided as a Supplement to the reader, together with an R markdown tutorial allowing the reproduction of all calculations and figures presented in this study.
AB - Statistical analysis has become increasingly important in optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating since it has become possible to measure signals at the single-grain scale. The accuracy of large chronological datasets can benefit from the inclusion, in chronological modelling, of stratigraphic constraints and shared systematic errors. Recently, a number of Bayesian models have been developed for OSL age calculation; the R package "BayLum"presented herein allows different models of this type to be implemented, particularly for samples in stratigraphic order which share systematic errors. We first show how to introduce stratigraphic constraints in BayLum; then, we focus on the construction, based on measurement uncertainties, of dose covariance matrices to account for systematic errors specific to OSL dating. The nature (systematic versus random) of errors affecting OSL ages is discussed, based - as an example - on the dose rate determination procedure at the IRAMAT-CRP2A laboratory (Bordeaux). The effects of the stratigraphic constraints and dose covariance matrices are illustrated on example datasets. In particular, the benefit of combining the modelling of systematic errors with independent ages, unaffected by these errors, is demonstrated. Finally, we discuss other common ways of estimating dose rates and how they may be taken into account in the covariance matrix by other potential users and laboratories. Test datasets are provided as a Supplement to the reader, together with an R markdown tutorial allowing the reproduction of all calculations and figures presented in this study.
KW - Bayesian modelling
KW - Luminescence dating
KW - Uncertainty analysis
KW - R
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123219543&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5194/gchron-3-229-2021
DO - 10.5194/gchron-3-229-2021
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85123219543
SN - 2628-3719
VL - 3
SP - 229
EP - 245
JO - Geochronology
JF - Geochronology
IS - 1
ER -