Volunteering in the bath? The rise of microvolunteering and implications for policy

Jesse Heley, Laura Jones, Sophie Yarker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (SciVal)
97 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper addresses the emergence of microvolunteering as a conceptual and practical phenomenon, as well as one which policy makers must engage with in a careful and critical fashion. Taking a lead from Smith et al. [2010. “Enlivened Geographies of Volunteering: Situated, Embodied and Emotional Practices of Voluntary Action.” Scottish Geographical Journal 126: 258–274] who specify a need to extend our analyses beyond the formal organizational spaces of volunteering, we consider the potential impact of micro-volunteering on changing patterns of civic participation over the next decade or two. With particular reference to policy ambitions and transformations in the UK, but with reference to broader international trends also, we set out how microvolunteering is being variously defined and appropriated as a means of addressing structural barriers to “traditional” volunteering. Drawing on a range of practical examples we consider how microvolunteering potentially alters the relationship between volunteering, community and identity, as well as relates to the parallel notion of “slacktivism”. Set against both positive and negative accounts of microvolunteering within the broader media, we advocate caution to policy makers looking to implement such activities, and particularly in respect to what microvolunteering can realistically achieve.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-89
Number of pages14
JournalPolicy Studies
Volume43
Issue number1
Early online date30 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 30 Jul 2019

Keywords

  • Volunteering
  • charity
  • fourth sector
  • microvolunteering
  • online
  • public sector
  • slacktivism
  • third sector

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Volunteering in the bath? The rise of microvolunteering and implications for policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this