Abstract
The current uncertainties about Iran’s motives and intentions reflect
the interplay of the psychological and material dimensions
of the security dilemma in international politics. In this article
NicholasWheeler shows howthe ideological fundamentalismthat
animates the Bush White House and its fellow travellers has led
the administration to replace the uncertainties about Tehran’s nuclear
intentions with the certainty that Iran has aggressivemotives
and intent. The problem with ideological fundamentalism is that
it closes down the possibility that others might be acting out of
fear and mistrust rather than malevolence, and crucially, it disregards
the role that one’s own actionsmight play in provoking that
fear.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 6-13 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Planet: The Welsh Internationalist |
Issue number | 186 |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2007 |