TY - JOUR
T1 - Why nature matters
T2 - A systematic review of intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values
AU - Himes, Austin
AU - Muraca, Barbara
AU - Anderson, Christopher B.
AU - Athayde, Simone
AU - Beery, Thomas
AU - Cantú-Fernández, Mariana
AU - González-Jiménez, David
AU - Gould, Rachelle K.
AU - Hejnowicz, A. P.
AU - Kenter, Jasper
AU - Lenzi, Dominic
AU - Murali, Ranjini
AU - Pascual, Unai
AU - Raymond, Christopher
AU - Ring, Annalie
AU - Russo, Kurt
AU - Samakov, Aibek
AU - Stålhammar, Sanna
AU - Thorén, Henrick
AU - Zent, Egleé
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Institute of Biological Sciences.
PY - 2024/1/31
Y1 - 2024/1/31
N2 - In this article, we
present results from a literature review of intrinsic, instrumental, and
relational values of nature conducted for the Intergovernmental
Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, as part
of the Methodological Assessment of the Diverse Values and Valuations of Nature.
We identify the most frequently recurring meanings in the heterogeneous
use of different value types and their association with worldviews and
other key concepts. From frequent uses, we determine a core meaning for
each value type, which is sufficiently inclusive to serve as an umbrella
over different understandings in the literature and specific enough to
help highlight its difference from the other types of values. Finally,
we discuss convergences, overlapping areas, and fuzzy boundaries between
different value types to facilitate dialogue, reduce misunderstandings,
and improve the methods for valuation of nature's contributions to
people, including ecosystem services, to inform policy and direct future
research.
AB - In this article, we
present results from a literature review of intrinsic, instrumental, and
relational values of nature conducted for the Intergovernmental
Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, as part
of the Methodological Assessment of the Diverse Values and Valuations of Nature.
We identify the most frequently recurring meanings in the heterogeneous
use of different value types and their association with worldviews and
other key concepts. From frequent uses, we determine a core meaning for
each value type, which is sufficiently inclusive to serve as an umbrella
over different understandings in the literature and specific enough to
help highlight its difference from the other types of values. Finally,
we discuss convergences, overlapping areas, and fuzzy boundaries between
different value types to facilitate dialogue, reduce misunderstandings,
and improve the methods for valuation of nature's contributions to
people, including ecosystem services, to inform policy and direct future
research.
KW - assessments
KW - biodiversity
KW - philosophy
KW - policy, ethics
KW - sustainability
KW - Sustainability
KW - Biodiversity
KW - Assessments
KW - Policy, Ethics
KW - Philosophy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184043764&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/biosci/biad109
DO - 10.1093/biosci/biad109
M3 - Review Article
C2 - 38313563
SN - 0006-3568
VL - 74
SP - 25
EP - 43
JO - BioScience
JF - BioScience
IS - 1
ER -